Learn More
Water Impact in Central Texas
Proposed data centers along the I-35 corridor would draw millions of gallons per day from the same water sources that serve Central Texas communities — during Stage 3 drought conditions when residents face mandatory restrictions.
Ready to act? See what you can do →
How data centers use water
Running servers generates enormous heat. Data centers cool their servers using evaporative cooling towers — the same technology as large industrial facilities. Water is sprayed over hot coils; it evaporates, carrying heat away. That water is gone.
How we estimate water demand
When a developer discloses their own water figures — in a permit application, development agreement, or regulatory filing — we use those directly. When figures are not disclosed, we calculate estimates from proposed IT capacity using published industry benchmarks:
- Direct cooling: 9,000–13,000 gal/day per MW
- Based on WUE 1.8–2.5 L/kWh (water use efficiency) at 80% capacity utilization. The upper bound reflects Central Texas summer heat — among the highest thermal loads in the U.S. LBNL/Shehabi et al. 2016; LBNL 2024 update; Uptime Institute 2016
- Indirect water (ERCOT grid power): 0.26–0.55 gal/kWh
- Water consumed by power plants supplying the Texas grid. The actual 2025 figure is likely lower (~0.15–0.35 gal/kWh) given ~36% wind/solar in ERCOT — we use the higher range conservatively. Scanlon et al. 2013
- Indirect water (on-site gas generation): 0.3–0.5 gal/kWh
- When a project builds its own natural gas plant, that water is consumed locally from the same supply serving nearby residents. Scanlon et al. 2013
Each project on the tracker shows its estimate confidence tier (Disclosed, Proxy, or Estimated). See the full methodology →
Cumulative projected demand
If all 34 tracked proposals are built, combined daily water demand would reach the totals below. The dashboard breaks demand down by water source region and by individual project.
Cumulative Water Impact · 34 Proposals Tracked
81–162 MGD
total projected daily water demand if all 34 proposals are built
Water consumed at power plants (ERCOT grid or on-site generation) to produce electricity
Impact by Water Source Region
Edwards Aquifer Region
Bexar, Comal & Hays Counties · 15 projects
Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer
Caldwell County · 4 projects
Proposed DCs represent 41.2× current county groundwater use at high estimate.
Guadalupe River System
Guadalupe County · 1 project
Palomino Alpha specifies recycled water per development agreement
Colorado River / Highland Lakes
Travis & Williamson Counties · 14 projects
| Project | MW | Direct cooling | Power generation | Total | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tract Data Center Technology Park | 4.0 GW | 1.5 MGD–16.6 MGD | 20.0 MGD–42.2 MGD | 21.5 MGD–58.8 MGD | Proxy |
| Powerhouse DC | 700 MW | 6.3 MGD–9.1 MGD | 3.5 MGD–7.4 MGD | 9.8 MGD–16.5 MGD | Estimate |
| CloudHQ SAT Campus | 600 MW | 5.4 MGD–7.8 MGD | 3.0 MGD–6.3 MGD | 8.4 MGD–14.1 MGD | Disclosed |
| Skybox PowerCampus Austin (Hutto) | 600 MW | 5.4 MGD–7.8 MGD | 3.0 MGD–6.3 MGD | 8.4 MGD–14.1 MGD | Disclosed |
| Edged Energy Campus — Caldwell County | 462 MW | 4.2 MGD–6.0 MGD | 2.3 MGD–4.9 MGD | 6.5 MGD–10.9 MGD | Estimate |
| Prime Data Centers — Austin (AUS01) | 384 MW | 3.5 MGD–5.0 MGD | 2.2 MGD–3.7 MGD | 5.7 MGD–8.7 MGD | Estimate |
| Palomino Alpha Data Center | 360 MW | 3.2 MGD–4.7 MGD | 1.8 MGD–3.8 MGD | 5.0 MGD–8.5 MGD | Estimate |
| Stream Data Centers San Antonio III | 200 MW | 1.8 MGD–2.6 MGD | 998K gal/d–2.1 MGD | 2.8 MGD–4.7 MGD | Disclosed |
| Highlander SM One Data Center | 380 MW | 20K gal/d–75K gal/d | 1.9 MGD–4.0 MGD | 1.9 MGD–4.1 MGD | Disclosed |
| CloudBurst Data Center Campus | 1.2 GW | 24K gal/d | 1.3 MGD–3.6 MGD | 1.3 MGD–3.6 MGD | Disclosed |
| Rowan Digital Cinco Data Center Campus | 300 MW | 129K gal/d | 1.5 MGD–3.2 MGD | 1.6 MGD–3.3 MGD | Disclosed |
| CyrusOne Austin Campus (MetCenter) | 100 MW | 900K gal/d–1.3 MGD | 499K gal/d–1.1 MGD | 1.4 MGD–2.4 MGD | Disclosed |
| Vantage Data Centers TX12 | 96 MW | 864K gal/d–1.2 MGD | 479K gal/d–1.0 MGD | 1.3 MGD–2.3 MGD | Disclosed |
| Switch The Rock Campus | 185 MW | 500 gal/d–5K gal/d | 924K gal/d–2.0 MGD | 924K gal/d–2.0 MGD | Disclosed |
| Zydeco Hutto Data Center | 70 MW | 630K gal/d–910K gal/d | 349K gal/d–739K gal/d | 979K gal/d–1.6 MGD | Disclosed |
| Blueprint Data Centers Taylor DC | 60 MW | 540K gal/d–780K gal/d | 300K gal/d–634K gal/d | 840K gal/d–1.4 MGD | Disclosed |
| Sabey SDC Austin Campus | 84 MW | 50 gal/d–500 gal/d | 419K gal/d–887K gal/d | 419K gal/d–888K gal/d | Disclosed |
| CyrusOne SAT6, Texas Research Park | 36 MW | 324K gal/d–468K gal/d | 180K gal/d–380K gal/d | 504K gal/d–848K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Skybox Datacenters Round Rock | 75 MW | 50 gal/d–500 gal/d | 374K gal/d–792K gal/d | 374K gal/d–793K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Blueprint Data Centers Georgetown DC | 25 MW | 225K gal/d–325K gal/d | 125K gal/d–264K gal/d | 350K gal/d–589K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Digital Realty AUS11 Austin | 16.5 MW | 150K gal/d–215K gal/d | 82K gal/d–174K gal/d | 232K gal/d–389K gal/d | Disclosed |
| CoreWeave Austin (Core Scientific) | 16 MW | 144K gal/d–208K gal/d | 80K gal/d–169K gal/d | 224K gal/d–377K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Skybox Austin I | 30 MW | 375 gal/d–54K gal/d | 150K gal/d–317K gal/d | 150K gal/d–371K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Skybox Austin II | 30 MW | 375 gal/d–54K gal/d | 150K gal/d–317K gal/d | 150K gal/d–371K gal/d | Disclosed |
| Amazon AWS — COPT Potranco Data Center | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Amazon AWS Bitter Blue Campus — Building B | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Colovore Project Raptor (Hutto) | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Doster Property — Unknown Data Center | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Iron Mountain Hutto Hyperscale Campus | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Microsoft County Road 381 Campus (SAT93/SAT94) | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Microsoft Westover Link Campus (SAT15/SAT16) | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Microsoft Wiseman Boulevard Data Center (SAT14) | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Sabey Data Center — San Marcos | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
| Vantage Data Centers TX22 | — | No data | No data | No data | No data |
21.5 MGD–58.8 MGD
Proxy- Powerhouse DC
700 MW
9.8 MGD–16.5 MGD
Estimate - CloudHQ SAT Campus
600 MW
8.4 MGD–14.1 MGD
Disclosed 8.4 MGD–14.1 MGD
Disclosed6.5 MGD–10.9 MGD
Estimate5.7 MGD–8.7 MGD
Estimate5.0 MGD–8.5 MGD
Estimate2.8 MGD–4.7 MGD
Disclosed1.9 MGD–4.1 MGD
Disclosed1.3 MGD–3.6 MGD
Disclosed1.6 MGD–3.3 MGD
Disclosed1.4 MGD–2.4 MGD
Disclosed1.3 MGD–2.3 MGD
Disclosed- Switch The Rock Campus
185 MW
924K gal/d–2.0 MGD
Disclosed 979K gal/d–1.6 MGD
Disclosed840K gal/d–1.4 MGD
Disclosed419K gal/d–888K gal/d
Disclosed504K gal/d–848K gal/d
Disclosed374K gal/d–793K gal/d
Disclosed350K gal/d–589K gal/d
Disclosed- Digital Realty AUS11 Austin
16.5 MW
232K gal/d–389K gal/d
Disclosed 224K gal/d–377K gal/d
Disclosed- Skybox Austin I
30 MW
150K gal/d–371K gal/d
Disclosed - Skybox Austin II
30 MW
150K gal/d–371K gal/d
Disclosed - Amazon AWS — COPT Potranco Data Center
MW unknown
No data
No data No data
No data- Colovore Project Raptor (Hutto)
MW unknown
No data
No data - Doster Property — Unknown Data Center
MW unknown
No data
No data - Iron Mountain Hutto Hyperscale Campus
MW unknown
No data
No data No data
No dataNo data
No dataNo data
No data- Sabey Data Center — San Marcos
MW unknown
No data
No data - Vantage Data Centers TX22
MW unknown
No data
No data
Stage 3 drought context: San Marcos residents are restricted to once-per-week watering. These proposed data centers face no equivalent restrictions. Total known proposed capacity: 10.0 GW. 10 projects with unknown MW capacity excluded from total — actual demand may be higher. See methodology →
What this means for your community
Stage 3 drought restrictions apply to residents — not to industrial water users like data centers. The comparison below shows proposed data center demand against San Marcos’s entire city water supply.
Stage 3 Drought · Central Texas
You’re cutting back. They’re not.
While San Marcos residents live under Stage 3 mandatory water restrictions, proposed data centers would draw millions of gallons per day — water the aquifer doesn’t have to spare.
residents’ worth of water
consumed by all proposed data centers at max estimated daily capacity
27,606 households · 125 gal/person/day · Stage 3 restrictions in effect
35.2 MGD low | 65.3 MGD high
Industry benchmark estimate (WUE ~1.8 L/kWh) — 34 facilities with known MW capacity
80.8 MGD low | 161.6 MGD high
Combined direct cooling + water consumed by power plants supplying the facilities
What Stage 3 means for you6
- No sprinkler or automatic irrigation except bi-weekly, overnight
- No car washing at home
- No fountain or decorative water feature operation
- Fines for water waste, runoff, or unrepaired leaks
- Soaker/drip irrigation limited to one day per week
- Impervious surface washing limited to once per week
Next steps
Browse tracked projects
See individual project data, timelines, and documents for every proposal we follow in the seven-county I-35 corridor.
View the tracker →Make your voice heard
Write to your elected officials, sign the petition, and show up to hearings where your voice has real weight.
Take action →Get updates when it matters
New project filings, hearing notices, and vote alerts — delivered to your inbox.
Get notified when new projects are filed and hearings are scheduled.
We’ll email you when new projects are filed or hearings are scheduled. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.